10th Villarceaux Declaration

of Eating City Summer Campus 2024

Read more

Targeting 100% Organic, Local and Homemade Meals in Dordogne Secondary Schools

Read more

Small plate, big impact

A healthy school meal for every child in every school - sign the petition here!

Read more

2nd Eating City - Food Wave Ambassador Meeting

Read more

Are you a Chef or a Champion?

Take part in the Cous Cous Challenge!

Read more

7th Villarceaux Declaration

of Eating City Summer Campus 2019

Read more

7th Eating City Summer Campus 2019

Why the Mayor of such a large city as Milan has decided to undertake the design of Food Policies for his city?

“Feeding the Planet, Energy for Life” is the theme chosen for the 2015 Milan Universal Exposition, where such issues as healthy and safe food, combating hunger and waste, water as a common good or sustainable development will be discussed. All these Third Millennium emergencies not only concern the largest metropolitan areas in the world but also the future of Milan and Italy. Expo 2015 has just speeded up our involvement.

During six months, Milan will become geographically the centre of a global debate about food, in a planet shared by 9 billion inhabitants in 2050 that is looking after a fairer and more balanced sustainable development. The Universal Exposition will deliver to the world a Food Chart, true pact among States, International Institutions and individuals. But Milan itself, as the city of Expo, is going further. It is carving out a precise role that looks far beyond 2015

Taking for granted that food is energy and driving force of development, Milan has proposed to other international metropolises an “Urban Food Policy Pact”, that will be signed by the relative Mayors, within a big event organised on the occasion of the World Food Day, next October. The city of Milan is working at present on the contents of the Pact, within a network of more than 30 foreign cities. In the meantime, together with the Cariplo Foundation, it is working on its own Food Policy as part of the construction of its Smart City strategy for a more intelligent and sustainable city that will insure a fairer future for its inhabitants.

What are the expected outcomes?

The Food Policy will give the city of Milan a central role in the urban agro-food system governance, to achieve some major objectives. First of all, to reduce food wastage: every year a family throws away the equivalent of 450€ of fresh food, bread, fruits and vegetables, with consequent impacts on the environment. Also, to improve human health and food access, to increase urban agricultural ecosystem biodiversity, to reduce food systems’ environmental impacts, to foster innovation for healthy and sustainable food production and distribution. Improving food education is a priority too, because most of the impacts are due to lifestyles and consumption patterns.

All these issues are treated within the Milan Food Policy and will frame a systemic and holistic vision for healthy, tasty, fair and sustainable food, accessible for all citizens.

Which levers and which ways do you intend to use in order to proceed with the establishment and the management of Food Policy, independently from projects co-financed by European or national funds? In other words do you plan to create a permanent structure that will be able to monitor and manage this medium-long term process?

Also in light of Expo 2015, the rethinking of the overall urban food system is a central issue for Milan. This challenge does not mean only local food and peri-urban agriculture. A new and positive link must be forged between those who produce, distribute and manage the relationships with consumers. Food wastage must be overcome. “Smarter” logistics must be implemented. It is a modernisation tool, for the city and for the training of new generations.

The whole administration is currently working together with all the companies in which the Council has a share, in order to achieve the targets we set for ourselves: from waste management to food education schemes at school, not to mention combating waste, still in the schools, where it is a significant commitment: in the last year and half, the equivalent of a ton of food per day has been saved in the schools of Milan.

The exchange with the other Mayors clearly highlights how important is the need for a body in charge of the coordination of all the policies related to Food Policy.

Do you believe that the “City” should care about what its own citizens are eating, beyond free individual choices?

Sure I do. We need to raise awareness about what is at stake, in terms of social, health and economic issues. The public debate in Milan is mature enough to contribute to define targets and improvement actions.

Do you think that food can be considered as a Common good? And that food flows should be, at least, monitored by the City?

Expo is also an opportunity for the City of Milan to increase its own awareness and care of the commons, particularly about the sensitive issue of urban agro-food system. And the city administration can’t help but be in the forefront.

Would it be useful that such policies were also represented at a higher institutional level?  – for instance at a regional /national /European level; this to implement a new global food governance?

In the so-called “Urban Century”, most of people will increasingly live in large urban areas. Today, more than half of the world’s population lives in cities and in 2030, it will be 60%. Some of these large cities have a GDP that exceeds the one of numerous nations: Milan produces more than Colombia, Washington more than South Africa, London more than Indonesia.

Recent surveys reveal that the “New Face of Hunger”, i.e. the deprivation of food, and above all of healthy food, will define unprecedented borders between neighbouring districts in all “averagely developed” cities. Therefore the management of all the agro-food related problems is becoming an explosive issue at a world-wide and local level – in the North and in the South of the Planet.

In a globalised world where mega-cities become more and more networked to build a sustainable development, great revolutions start at local level. Thus for food policies. Therefore, urban administrations can serve as aggregators to facilitate all the other stakeholders, reconciling the commitment of citizens, with the non-profit world, companies and other institutions. For practical policies.

Humans have through their actions and inactions almost put into danger every other species and now try battling to save themselves just like the satire given in the use of the Nile perch. I compare the excellent narrative and analysis of The Ecology of Law to be a recapitulation of the climate of fear we are almost loosing energy to resist.

The two excellent scholars maintain that while the rhetoric of science and jurisprudence may bind people together it could also blind them. They vehemently belief in the restoration of dignity particularly to the dispossessed people via collaborative networks among all stakeholders especially scientists and legal scholars. They consider peaceful intellectual and collaborative negotiations and participation to be the solution at the heart of our ecological crises.

Finding any solution to the already uncontrolled ‘ecological crises’ as the authors prefer to express it, must come first under science and law and others only secondarily. They call to convergence between the “law of nature and the law of man” to combat today’s global ecological crises and prevent that of the future.

Modernity pays more attention to market without fundamentally given consideration to where the products are coming from and how they should be used to regenerate more. Law should not be seen as a means of violence or power but rather it should solidify the cultural and traditional lives of the people and make them sovereign. Only in this way, the commons could be generative.

The Ecology of Law sufficiently and aptly presented how better institutions could lead to better ecology and stronger people.

Joris Lohman, Executive Committee for Slow Food International said: “‘The Common Agricultural Policy is of crucial importance to every ‘eater’, yet due to its complexity, many people do not understand what impact the CAP has on their daily lives. I am very much looking forward to the launch of the ‘CAP, What’s cooking?’ project, to see the faces of the young chefs and ‘foodies’ that will work side-by-side with Europe’s young farmers to explore the ’tasty’ side of agricultural policy!”.

The launch will mark the start of a new Groupe de Bruges’ project to communicate the CAP 2014-2020 to the general public. Following the Milan event, seven local events will be held in March and April 2016 on farms across the European Union. Each will host a one day programme of farm tours, cookery workshops by local chefs, CAP presentations by experts and stakeholders as well as lunch- and dinner-debates.
In parallel a CAP Cook Book, will be developed and will include brief explanations on the various topics of the Common Agricultural Policy, farm portraits and recipes from renowned, local chefs, using products from the area.
More information on the project is available at http://www.capwhatscooking.eu

event150914-agurb2015

Urbanisation is a troublesome reality. By 2050, 70% of the population will live in cities, thus increasing the pressure on food systems, with the necessity to preserve land for food production and to manage enormous food flows towards cities. Among the challenges to face, there are 3  food paradoxes :

– malnutrition,
– land grabbing
– food losses and waste.

Our commitment on these must be related to the necessity we have to adapt to on-going climate changes, to work hard on global warming mitigation and to stop wasting all non renewable ressources…

Many speakers have invited us to question the logics that have brought us to where we are and in particular the omnipotence of technology. Transition asks us to move, either at personnal and collective level, from dualism towards integration.

This concerns many issues such as urban/rural, production/consumption, global/local, food sustainability/food safety etc.

Looking at agriculture, the modernization has been mainly based on chemistry and physics with emphasis on mechanization and chemical inputs. The reflexion on agro-ecology gives many indications on the ways to revert such trend, starting to restore farmers as stewarts of life rather than users of land and resources.

It is necessary to recognize the value of small scale farming and create more equitable situation in front of intensive monocultures development. As it has been quoted during plenary sessions :

Chinese peasants feed 22% of world population with only 7% of the world arable land. Such chinese experience shows that small scale agriculture is possible.

Looking for solutions, we must keep in mind that food is not only a concern,  for it can be also a lever to reduce environmental impacts, increase resilience capacity and impulse local dynamics of social innovation.

In such an « open for change situation », civil society has a role to play as a space of innovation and  as a driver of change for transition towards sustainable food systems. New governance models are needed that take into account the aspirations of civil society and facilitate the grass roots innovations. In such context, food policy councils can be considered as one of the most proeminent and rapid innovation in the last decade.

Domaine de Villarceaux is the proud witness of centuries old episodes of French history, and not too far from them we were working diligently on the future of the most important thing in the human existence: Food, as sustenance and nourishment, with all the pleasure and pain it entails.

We started our journey seeing how water, air, fire and earth interact within the food system, and explored how the food system affects all four of them. From the world of phytoplanktons with Pierre Mollo, the threats of climate change with Lučka Bogataj, to how much energy goes into our food with Alessandro Cerutti, and soil degradation with Boris Boincean. These intense eye openers fuelled the group discussions, fostered by participation and sharing, and led eventually to thinking of the Fifth element, the ether, the human spirit, the essence of life, that happens to be the missing ingredient in all our food related arguments. As concious beings we need nourishment, that we cannot acheive by tampering with the four elements in order to produce food and bring it to our tables.

And so a declaration was signed to reflect the aspirations and hopes of 42 young people who only want the best for themselves and the world around them, encompassing not only humans, not only sentient beings, but all of existence that surrounds us. It doesn’t end there though, as we are devoting the morning of our last day together to disseminate this powerful message through all the channels that matter, and create a mechanism by which we could really remain united for food.

We share a passion and concern for our food systems, and acknowledge an urgent need for a shift in paradigm – but we are full of hope. We propose solutions using the framework of the five elements:

WATER is a common and non-renewable resource facing continuous threats. It must be protected for future generations without compromising quality.

  1. Ensure equitable access to clean water by fostering collective management and impeding speculation, financialization and commodification
  2. Conserve water use in the food system by improving efficiency of irrigation and processing
  3. Prevent water contamination by minimizing pollution from agriculture and industry
  4. Invest in innovative practices such as rain water harvesting and recycling of grey water
  5. Empower small-scale fishing communities and enhance ecologically-responsible practices in aquaculture

AIR is the circulatory system that regulates our biosphere. We are responsible for irreversible changes to our climate. We must mitigate our impacts on the air and adapt to imminent changes in order to give breath to the next generations.

  1. Promote agricultural practices that both reduce emissions and protect air quality
  2. Encourage less greenhouse gas- (GHG) intensive supply chains through tracking and taxing emissions
  3. Encourage consumers to reduce excessive meat consumption and adopt more plant-based diets

EARTH, the living organism from which we grow, is in danger due to our technocratic culture of limitless growth, negligence and apathy. When we plant poison, we harvest poison. We must integrate ourselves into the cycle of the earth and feed the soil instead of the yield.

  1. Address food security and public health in cities through promotion of urban agriculture and community-based models of distribution
  2. Strengthen urban-rural connections to facilitate market access and direct contact between producers and consumers
  3. Facilitate land reform in order to create fair land tenure systems and guarantee land access for small-scale and young farmers, as well as traditional and Indigenous communities
  4. Create policy mechanisms to protect fertile land from the encroachment of urban sprawl
  5. Improve infrastructure and change marketing and consumption practices to reduce food loss and waste across the food supply chain
  6. Adopt best management practices at the farm level to restore and protect soil fertility
  7. Foster organization and knowledge-sharing between farmers as an incentive for resilient and restorative family farming
  8. Invest responsibly in rural development and facilitate access to infrastructure, technology and education
  9. Foster seed sovereignty and protect biodiversity by valuing local plant varieties and ensuring control over reproductive resources

FIRE is an expression of energy that has spurred the development and growth of civilization. Energy is not created or destroyed, it is only transformed. Therefore, we must prioritize cleaner sources of energy, appropriately and responsibly managed, to heal our food systems.

  1. Transition to renewable and responsible energy sources along the food supply chain
  2. Manage and save energy in food production, storage, distribution and waste systems
  3. Encourage energy-efficient, local, and short supply chains and seasonal consumption habits
  4. Recognize equitable human labour as a valuable source of energy in the food system
  5. Ensure that biofuel production does not compromise food security

THE FIFTH ELEMENT unites all others and represents food as more than a fuel or the sum of its parts. It is belonging. It is appreciation. It is connection. It nourishes the human spirit and body. However, it is the missing ingredient in our current food system and integral to a new one. We must revise and uphold our values and nurture connections between ourselves and the ecosystems which support life.

  1. Eat mindfully and relish the experience of savouring taste
  2. Ensure food quality, human rights, fair working conditions, and animal and ecological welfare
  3. Respect cultural heritage, traditions and rights around land and food, and incorporate traditional and Indigenous wisdom into our food systems
  4. Foster a human ethic of respect, awareness and empathy towards land, water, air and food
  5. Build community by sharing our knowledge and experiences in the food system
  6. Acknowledge food as sacred, as a pillar of food sovereignty

We believe that we need to address the root causes of global food and agriculture crises rather than the symptoms. In the short-term, we need to reform our economic system by increasing transparency and redefining measures of success from reductionist to holistic, from quantity to quality, and from growth to stability and resilience. In the long-term, we need a systemic socio-cultural shift from an egocentric ethic of competition and commodification to an ecocentric and partnership ethic of co-operation and community. These changes should be made by fostering grassroots activities and food sovereignty; respecting and integrating cultural heritage and traditional ecological knowledge; re-framing our educational and information systems; demanding an intersectional approach to equity, incorporating gender, ethnicity, socio-economic class, age, and ability; decentralizing and redistributing power to local communities; and reforming political governance mechanisms to facilitate this change.

No one solution will be effective if implemented in isolation, they must be adopted together. As we – the youth of Eating City Summer Campus 2015 – return to our respective regions, we will be working towards these goals through our engagement in the food system. In acknowledgement of the urgency of our current state, we expect that these solutions will be implemented in policy and decision-making at multiple scales.

We call to action a change in our food system paradigm.

La Bergerie de Villarceaux, August 19, 2015

Download the signed declaration

Error: Contact form not found.

Eating City Blog FNH banniere-300-250-cagette

Such shift of Public Food Policy towards sustainable food systems is emblematic of the cultural change good public meals may induce in the population.

If the introduction of organic food often is the way to initiate a change, more generally, the modification of meal ingredients and the reduction of food wastage are two major areas of focus that drive to a deep and challenging reorganization of meal preparation, only feasible with skilled staff. Therefore training and education, to raise awareness and increase skills are a main leverage of action.

Because of the foregoing, Eating City is glad to be part of this collaborative tool kit, by sharing all suitable ressources: report best practices, videos, etc.  that can contribute, together with all other partners of this portal, to support projects owners, from farm to fork, producers, buyers, cooks, but also assocuiations and local authorities, who all have a part to play in sustainable public food services.

See more

Despite the evidence that a city eats – it eats food and in some way the land needed to produce it -, accelerating the decline of rural territories, food is not usually considered among the competences of a city. Moreover, food issues are too often diluted between different aspects related to health, nutrition, environment, production, public food services or local economy, all being treated separately in a counterproductive systematic approach. However today, more and more cities re-evaluate food projects as means to improve urban planning and management, thus opening simultaneously several avenues for reflection, research and action. In a stimulating space of innovation, they are looking at new roles for institutions in food innovation dynamics and at tailor-made interfaces of cooperation between urban centers and adjacent territories. Innovative propositions are experimented, to combine food democratic imperatives, open participatory processes and food issues institutionalization, whereas a long-awaited common metric system is still needed to assess the consequences of food systems on environmental, social, economic assets.

All these cities involved in pro-active food related urban policies are driven by extremely diverse motivations, ranging from:

  • the fragility of a food system exclusively relying on globalized commodities, subject to speculation,
  • the added value of a vivid local economy based on high quality food production,
  • an agenda 21 and a plan for the reduction of CO2 emissions,
  • the potential of healthy food access to control obesity epidemics or to educate young people to make healthier food choices,
  • etc.

The exam of successful projects shows how these pioneers have been able to detect the capacity of food-related projects to strengthen social cohesion and create a social bond, on top of many other benefits. Indeed, not only food can become a thread that connect all the main competences of the cities related to urban environment, economic development, education, solidarity, culture and leisure, health, politics and governance, but it can also give consistency to a synergic osmosis between cities and adjacent territories.

Historically, food has been a pivotal factor in the political construction of Europe, as Common Agriculture Policy has been one of the pillars of the European Union. Therefore, as food and drink industry is the largest EU manufacturing sector in terms of turnover and employment, it is not a utopia to think that sustainable food systems could become major assets of the Europe 2020 strategy of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.

Urban Food Policies: for an Urban/Rural Symbiosis

"If planners are not conscious [of food issues], then their impact is negative, not neutral." Kami Pothukuchi

Why the Mayor of such a large city as Milan has decided to undertake the design of Food Policies for his city?

“Feeding the Planet, Energy for Life” is the theme chosen for the 2015 Milan Universal Exposition, where such issues as healthy and safe food, combating hunger and waste, water as a common good or sustainable development will be discussed. All these Third Millennium emergencies not only concern the largest metropolitan areas in the world but also the future of Milan and Italy. Expo 2015 has just speeded up our involvement.

During six months, Milan will become geographically the centre of a global debate about food, in a planet shared by 9 billion inhabitants in 2050 that is looking after a fairer and more balanced sustainable development. The Universal Exposition will deliver to the world a Food Chart, true pact among States, International Institutions and individuals. But Milan itself, as the city of Expo, is going further. It is carving out a precise role that looks far beyond 2015

Taking for granted that food is energy and driving force of development, Milan has proposed to other international metropolises an “Urban Food Policy Pact”, that will be signed by the relative Mayors, within a big event organised on the occasion of the World Food Day, next October. The city of Milan is working at present on the contents of the Pact, within a network of more than 30 foreign cities. In the meantime, together with the Cariplo Foundation, it is working on its own Food Policy as part of the construction of its Smart City strategy for a more intelligent and sustainable city that will insure a fairer future for its inhabitants.

What are the expected outcomes?

The Food Policy will give the city of Milan a central role in the urban agro-food system governance, to achieve some major objectives. First of all, to reduce food wastage: every year a family throws away the equivalent of 450€ of fresh food, bread, fruits and vegetables, with consequent impacts on the environment. Also, to improve human health and food access, to increase urban agricultural ecosystem biodiversity, to reduce food systems’ environmental impacts, to foster innovation for healthy and sustainable food production and distribution. Improving food education is a priority too, because most of the impacts are due to lifestyles and consumption patterns.

All these issues are treated within the Milan Food Policy and will frame a systemic and holistic vision for healthy, tasty, fair and sustainable food, accessible for all citizens.

Which levers and which ways do you intend to use in order to proceed with the establishment and the management of Food Policy, independently from projects co-financed by European or national funds? In other words do you plan to create a permanent structure that will be able to monitor and manage this medium-long term process?

Also in light of Expo 2015, the rethinking of the overall urban food system is a central issue for Milan. This challenge does not mean only local food and peri-urban agriculture. A new and positive link must be forged between those who produce, distribute and manage the relationships with consumers. Food wastage must be overcome. “Smarter” logistics must be implemented. It is a modernisation tool, for the city and for the training of new generations.

The whole administration is currently working together with all the companies in which the Council has a share, in order to achieve the targets we set for ourselves: from waste management to food education schemes at school, not to mention combating waste, still in the schools, where it is a significant commitment: in the last year and half, the equivalent of a ton of food per day has been saved in the schools of Milan.

The exchange with the other Mayors clearly highlights how important is the need for a body in charge of the coordination of all the policies related to Food Policy.

Do you believe that the “City” should care about what its own citizens are eating, beyond free individual choices?

Sure I do. We need to raise awareness about what is at stake, in terms of social, health and economic issues. The public debate in Milan is mature enough to contribute to define targets and improvement actions.

Do you think that food can be considered as a Common good? And that food flows should be, at least, monitored by the City?

Expo is also an opportunity for the City of Milan to increase its own awareness and care of the commons, particularly about the sensitive issue of urban agro-food system. And the city administration can’t help but be in the forefront.

Would it be useful that such policies were also represented at a higher institutional level?  – for instance at a regional /national /European level; this to implement a new global food governance?

In the so-called “Urban Century”, most of people will increasingly live in large urban areas. Today, more than half of the world’s population lives in cities and in 2030, it will be 60%. Some of these large cities have a GDP that exceeds the one of numerous nations: Milan produces more than Colombia, Washington more than South Africa, London more than Indonesia.

Recent surveys reveal that the “New Face of Hunger”, i.e. the deprivation of food, and above all of healthy food, will define unprecedented borders between neighbouring districts in all “averagely developed” cities. Therefore the management of all the agro-food related problems is becoming an explosive issue at a world-wide and local level – in the North and in the South of the Planet.

In a globalised world where mega-cities become more and more networked to build a sustainable development, great revolutions start at local level. Thus for food policies. Therefore, urban administrations can serve as aggregators to facilitate all the other stakeholders, reconciling the commitment of citizens, with the non-profit world, companies and other institutions. For practical policies.

Humans have through their actions and inactions almost put into danger every other species and now try battling to save themselves just like the satire given in the use of the Nile perch. I compare the excellent narrative and analysis of The Ecology of Law to be a recapitulation of the climate of fear we are almost loosing energy to resist.

The two excellent scholars maintain that while the rhetoric of science and jurisprudence may bind people together it could also blind them. They vehemently belief in the restoration of dignity particularly to the dispossessed people via collaborative networks among all stakeholders especially scientists and legal scholars. They consider peaceful intellectual and collaborative negotiations and participation to be the solution at the heart of our ecological crises.

Finding any solution to the already uncontrolled ‘ecological crises’ as the authors prefer to express it, must come first under science and law and others only secondarily. They call to convergence between the “law of nature and the law of man” to combat today’s global ecological crises and prevent that of the future.

Modernity pays more attention to market without fundamentally given consideration to where the products are coming from and how they should be used to regenerate more. Law should not be seen as a means of violence or power but rather it should solidify the cultural and traditional lives of the people and make them sovereign. Only in this way, the commons could be generative.

The Ecology of Law sufficiently and aptly presented how better institutions could lead to better ecology and stronger people.

Joris Lohman, Executive Committee for Slow Food International said: “‘The Common Agricultural Policy is of crucial importance to every ‘eater’, yet due to its complexity, many people do not understand what impact the CAP has on their daily lives. I am very much looking forward to the launch of the ‘CAP, What’s cooking?’ project, to see the faces of the young chefs and ‘foodies’ that will work side-by-side with Europe’s young farmers to explore the ’tasty’ side of agricultural policy!”.

The launch will mark the start of a new Groupe de Bruges’ project to communicate the CAP 2014-2020 to the general public. Following the Milan event, seven local events will be held in March and April 2016 on farms across the European Union. Each will host a one day programme of farm tours, cookery workshops by local chefs, CAP presentations by experts and stakeholders as well as lunch- and dinner-debates.
In parallel a CAP Cook Book, will be developed and will include brief explanations on the various topics of the Common Agricultural Policy, farm portraits and recipes from renowned, local chefs, using products from the area.
More information on the project is available at http://www.capwhatscooking.eu

event150914-agurb2015

Urbanisation is a troublesome reality. By 2050, 70% of the population will live in cities, thus increasing the pressure on food systems, with the necessity to preserve land for food production and to manage enormous food flows towards cities. Among the challenges to face, there are 3  food paradoxes :

– malnutrition,
– land grabbing
– food losses and waste.

Our commitment on these must be related to the necessity we have to adapt to on-going climate changes, to work hard on global warming mitigation and to stop wasting all non renewable ressources…

Many speakers have invited us to question the logics that have brought us to where we are and in particular the omnipotence of technology. Transition asks us to move, either at personnal and collective level, from dualism towards integration.

This concerns many issues such as urban/rural, production/consumption, global/local, food sustainability/food safety etc.

Looking at agriculture, the modernization has been mainly based on chemistry and physics with emphasis on mechanization and chemical inputs. The reflexion on agro-ecology gives many indications on the ways to revert such trend, starting to restore farmers as stewarts of life rather than users of land and resources.

It is necessary to recognize the value of small scale farming and create more equitable situation in front of intensive monocultures development. As it has been quoted during plenary sessions :

Chinese peasants feed 22% of world population with only 7% of the world arable land. Such chinese experience shows that small scale agriculture is possible.

Looking for solutions, we must keep in mind that food is not only a concern,  for it can be also a lever to reduce environmental impacts, increase resilience capacity and impulse local dynamics of social innovation.

In such an « open for change situation », civil society has a role to play as a space of innovation and  as a driver of change for transition towards sustainable food systems. New governance models are needed that take into account the aspirations of civil society and facilitate the grass roots innovations. In such context, food policy councils can be considered as one of the most proeminent and rapid innovation in the last decade.

Domaine de Villarceaux is the proud witness of centuries old episodes of French history, and not too far from them we were working diligently on the future of the most important thing in the human existence: Food, as sustenance and nourishment, with all the pleasure and pain it entails.

We started our journey seeing how water, air, fire and earth interact within the food system, and explored how the food system affects all four of them. From the world of phytoplanktons with Pierre Mollo, the threats of climate change with Lučka Bogataj, to how much energy goes into our food with Alessandro Cerutti, and soil degradation with Boris Boincean. These intense eye openers fuelled the group discussions, fostered by participation and sharing, and led eventually to thinking of the Fifth element, the ether, the human spirit, the essence of life, that happens to be the missing ingredient in all our food related arguments. As concious beings we need nourishment, that we cannot acheive by tampering with the four elements in order to produce food and bring it to our tables.

And so a declaration was signed to reflect the aspirations and hopes of 42 young people who only want the best for themselves and the world around them, encompassing not only humans, not only sentient beings, but all of existence that surrounds us. It doesn’t end there though, as we are devoting the morning of our last day together to disseminate this powerful message through all the channels that matter, and create a mechanism by which we could really remain united for food.

We share a passion and concern for our food systems, and acknowledge an urgent need for a shift in paradigm – but we are full of hope. We propose solutions using the framework of the five elements:

WATER is a common and non-renewable resource facing continuous threats. It must be protected for future generations without compromising quality.

  1. Ensure equitable access to clean water by fostering collective management and impeding speculation, financialization and commodification
  2. Conserve water use in the food system by improving efficiency of irrigation and processing
  3. Prevent water contamination by minimizing pollution from agriculture and industry
  4. Invest in innovative practices such as rain water harvesting and recycling of grey water
  5. Empower small-scale fishing communities and enhance ecologically-responsible practices in aquaculture

AIR is the circulatory system that regulates our biosphere. We are responsible for irreversible changes to our climate. We must mitigate our impacts on the air and adapt to imminent changes in order to give breath to the next generations.

  1. Promote agricultural practices that both reduce emissions and protect air quality
  2. Encourage less greenhouse gas- (GHG) intensive supply chains through tracking and taxing emissions
  3. Encourage consumers to reduce excessive meat consumption and adopt more plant-based diets

EARTH, the living organism from which we grow, is in danger due to our technocratic culture of limitless growth, negligence and apathy. When we plant poison, we harvest poison. We must integrate ourselves into the cycle of the earth and feed the soil instead of the yield.

  1. Address food security and public health in cities through promotion of urban agriculture and community-based models of distribution
  2. Strengthen urban-rural connections to facilitate market access and direct contact between producers and consumers
  3. Facilitate land reform in order to create fair land tenure systems and guarantee land access for small-scale and young farmers, as well as traditional and Indigenous communities
  4. Create policy mechanisms to protect fertile land from the encroachment of urban sprawl
  5. Improve infrastructure and change marketing and consumption practices to reduce food loss and waste across the food supply chain
  6. Adopt best management practices at the farm level to restore and protect soil fertility
  7. Foster organization and knowledge-sharing between farmers as an incentive for resilient and restorative family farming
  8. Invest responsibly in rural development and facilitate access to infrastructure, technology and education
  9. Foster seed sovereignty and protect biodiversity by valuing local plant varieties and ensuring control over reproductive resources

FIRE is an expression of energy that has spurred the development and growth of civilization. Energy is not created or destroyed, it is only transformed. Therefore, we must prioritize cleaner sources of energy, appropriately and responsibly managed, to heal our food systems.

  1. Transition to renewable and responsible energy sources along the food supply chain
  2. Manage and save energy in food production, storage, distribution and waste systems
  3. Encourage energy-efficient, local, and short supply chains and seasonal consumption habits
  4. Recognize equitable human labour as a valuable source of energy in the food system
  5. Ensure that biofuel production does not compromise food security

THE FIFTH ELEMENT unites all others and represents food as more than a fuel or the sum of its parts. It is belonging. It is appreciation. It is connection. It nourishes the human spirit and body. However, it is the missing ingredient in our current food system and integral to a new one. We must revise and uphold our values and nurture connections between ourselves and the ecosystems which support life.

  1. Eat mindfully and relish the experience of savouring taste
  2. Ensure food quality, human rights, fair working conditions, and animal and ecological welfare
  3. Respect cultural heritage, traditions and rights around land and food, and incorporate traditional and Indigenous wisdom into our food systems
  4. Foster a human ethic of respect, awareness and empathy towards land, water, air and food
  5. Build community by sharing our knowledge and experiences in the food system
  6. Acknowledge food as sacred, as a pillar of food sovereignty

We believe that we need to address the root causes of global food and agriculture crises rather than the symptoms. In the short-term, we need to reform our economic system by increasing transparency and redefining measures of success from reductionist to holistic, from quantity to quality, and from growth to stability and resilience. In the long-term, we need a systemic socio-cultural shift from an egocentric ethic of competition and commodification to an ecocentric and partnership ethic of co-operation and community. These changes should be made by fostering grassroots activities and food sovereignty; respecting and integrating cultural heritage and traditional ecological knowledge; re-framing our educational and information systems; demanding an intersectional approach to equity, incorporating gender, ethnicity, socio-economic class, age, and ability; decentralizing and redistributing power to local communities; and reforming political governance mechanisms to facilitate this change.

No one solution will be effective if implemented in isolation, they must be adopted together. As we – the youth of Eating City Summer Campus 2015 – return to our respective regions, we will be working towards these goals through our engagement in the food system. In acknowledgement of the urgency of our current state, we expect that these solutions will be implemented in policy and decision-making at multiple scales.

We call to action a change in our food system paradigm.

La Bergerie de Villarceaux, August 19, 2015

Download the signed declaration

Error: Contact form not found.

Eating City Blog FNH banniere-300-250-cagette

Such shift of Public Food Policy towards sustainable food systems is emblematic of the cultural change good public meals may induce in the population.

If the introduction of organic food often is the way to initiate a change, more generally, the modification of meal ingredients and the reduction of food wastage are two major areas of focus that drive to a deep and challenging reorganization of meal preparation, only feasible with skilled staff. Therefore training and education, to raise awareness and increase skills are a main leverage of action.

Because of the foregoing, Eating City is glad to be part of this collaborative tool kit, by sharing all suitable ressources: report best practices, videos, etc.  that can contribute, together with all other partners of this portal, to support projects owners, from farm to fork, producers, buyers, cooks, but also assocuiations and local authorities, who all have a part to play in sustainable public food services.

See more

Despite the evidence that a city eats – it eats food and in some way the land needed to produce it -, accelerating the decline of rural territories, food is not usually considered among the competences of a city. Moreover, food issues are too often diluted between different aspects related to health, nutrition, environment, production, public food services or local economy, all being treated separately in a counterproductive systematic approach. However today, more and more cities re-evaluate food projects as means to improve urban planning and management, thus opening simultaneously several avenues for reflection, research and action. In a stimulating space of innovation, they are looking at new roles for institutions in food innovation dynamics and at tailor-made interfaces of cooperation between urban centers and adjacent territories. Innovative propositions are experimented, to combine food democratic imperatives, open participatory processes and food issues institutionalization, whereas a long-awaited common metric system is still needed to assess the consequences of food systems on environmental, social, economic assets.

All these cities involved in pro-active food related urban policies are driven by extremely diverse motivations, ranging from:

  • the fragility of a food system exclusively relying on globalized commodities, subject to speculation,
  • the added value of a vivid local economy based on high quality food production,
  • an agenda 21 and a plan for the reduction of CO2 emissions,
  • the potential of healthy food access to control obesity epidemics or to educate young people to make healthier food choices,
  • etc.

The exam of successful projects shows how these pioneers have been able to detect the capacity of food-related projects to strengthen social cohesion and create a social bond, on top of many other benefits. Indeed, not only food can become a thread that connect all the main competences of the cities related to urban environment, economic development, education, solidarity, culture and leisure, health, politics and governance, but it can also give consistency to a synergic osmosis between cities and adjacent territories.

Historically, food has been a pivotal factor in the political construction of Europe, as Common Agriculture Policy has been one of the pillars of the European Union. Therefore, as food and drink industry is the largest EU manufacturing sector in terms of turnover and employment, it is not a utopia to think that sustainable food systems could become major assets of the Europe 2020 strategy of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.

Urban Food Policies: for an Urban/Rural Symbiosis

"If planners are not conscious [of food issues], then their impact is negative, not neutral." Kami Pothukuchi

Why the Mayor of such a large city as Milan has decided to undertake the design of Food Policies for his city?

“Feeding the Planet, Energy for Life” is the theme chosen for the 2015 Milan Universal Exposition, where such issues as healthy and safe food, combating hunger and waste, water as a common good or sustainable development will be discussed. All these Third Millennium emergencies not only concern the largest metropolitan areas in the world but also the future of Milan and Italy. Expo 2015 has just speeded up our involvement.

During six months, Milan will become geographically the centre of a global debate about food, in a planet shared by 9 billion inhabitants in 2050 that is looking after a fairer and more balanced sustainable development. The Universal Exposition will deliver to the world a Food Chart, true pact among States, International Institutions and individuals. But Milan itself, as the city of Expo, is going further. It is carving out a precise role that looks far beyond 2015

Taking for granted that food is energy and driving force of development, Milan has proposed to other international metropolises an “Urban Food Policy Pact”, that will be signed by the relative Mayors, within a big event organised on the occasion of the World Food Day, next October. The city of Milan is working at present on the contents of the Pact, within a network of more than 30 foreign cities. In the meantime, together with the Cariplo Foundation, it is working on its own Food Policy as part of the construction of its Smart City strategy for a more intelligent and sustainable city that will insure a fairer future for its inhabitants.

What are the expected outcomes?

The Food Policy will give the city of Milan a central role in the urban agro-food system governance, to achieve some major objectives. First of all, to reduce food wastage: every year a family throws away the equivalent of 450€ of fresh food, bread, fruits and vegetables, with consequent impacts on the environment. Also, to improve human health and food access, to increase urban agricultural ecosystem biodiversity, to reduce food systems’ environmental impacts, to foster innovation for healthy and sustainable food production and distribution. Improving food education is a priority too, because most of the impacts are due to lifestyles and consumption patterns.

All these issues are treated within the Milan Food Policy and will frame a systemic and holistic vision for healthy, tasty, fair and sustainable food, accessible for all citizens.

Which levers and which ways do you intend to use in order to proceed with the establishment and the management of Food Policy, independently from projects co-financed by European or national funds? In other words do you plan to create a permanent structure that will be able to monitor and manage this medium-long term process?

Also in light of Expo 2015, the rethinking of the overall urban food system is a central issue for Milan. This challenge does not mean only local food and peri-urban agriculture. A new and positive link must be forged between those who produce, distribute and manage the relationships with consumers. Food wastage must be overcome. “Smarter” logistics must be implemented. It is a modernisation tool, for the city and for the training of new generations.

The whole administration is currently working together with all the companies in which the Council has a share, in order to achieve the targets we set for ourselves: from waste management to food education schemes at school, not to mention combating waste, still in the schools, where it is a significant commitment: in the last year and half, the equivalent of a ton of food per day has been saved in the schools of Milan.

The exchange with the other Mayors clearly highlights how important is the need for a body in charge of the coordination of all the policies related to Food Policy.

Do you believe that the “City” should care about what its own citizens are eating, beyond free individual choices?

Sure I do. We need to raise awareness about what is at stake, in terms of social, health and economic issues. The public debate in Milan is mature enough to contribute to define targets and improvement actions.

Do you think that food can be considered as a Common good? And that food flows should be, at least, monitored by the City?

Expo is also an opportunity for the City of Milan to increase its own awareness and care of the commons, particularly about the sensitive issue of urban agro-food system. And the city administration can’t help but be in the forefront.

Would it be useful that such policies were also represented at a higher institutional level?  – for instance at a regional /national /European level; this to implement a new global food governance?

In the so-called “Urban Century”, most of people will increasingly live in large urban areas. Today, more than half of the world’s population lives in cities and in 2030, it will be 60%. Some of these large cities have a GDP that exceeds the one of numerous nations: Milan produces more than Colombia, Washington more than South Africa, London more than Indonesia.

Recent surveys reveal that the “New Face of Hunger”, i.e. the deprivation of food, and above all of healthy food, will define unprecedented borders between neighbouring districts in all “averagely developed” cities. Therefore the management of all the agro-food related problems is becoming an explosive issue at a world-wide and local level – in the North and in the South of the Planet.

In a globalised world where mega-cities become more and more networked to build a sustainable development, great revolutions start at local level. Thus for food policies. Therefore, urban administrations can serve as aggregators to facilitate all the other stakeholders, reconciling the commitment of citizens, with the non-profit world, companies and other institutions. For practical policies.

Humans have through their actions and inactions almost put into danger every other species and now try battling to save themselves just like the satire given in the use of the Nile perch. I compare the excellent narrative and analysis of The Ecology of Law to be a recapitulation of the climate of fear we are almost loosing energy to resist.

The two excellent scholars maintain that while the rhetoric of science and jurisprudence may bind people together it could also blind them. They vehemently belief in the restoration of dignity particularly to the dispossessed people via collaborative networks among all stakeholders especially scientists and legal scholars. They consider peaceful intellectual and collaborative negotiations and participation to be the solution at the heart of our ecological crises.

Finding any solution to the already uncontrolled ‘ecological crises’ as the authors prefer to express it, must come first under science and law and others only secondarily. They call to convergence between the “law of nature and the law of man” to combat today’s global ecological crises and prevent that of the future.

Modernity pays more attention to market without fundamentally given consideration to where the products are coming from and how they should be used to regenerate more. Law should not be seen as a means of violence or power but rather it should solidify the cultural and traditional lives of the people and make them sovereign. Only in this way, the commons could be generative.

The Ecology of Law sufficiently and aptly presented how better institutions could lead to better ecology and stronger people.

Joris Lohman, Executive Committee for Slow Food International said: “‘The Common Agricultural Policy is of crucial importance to every ‘eater’, yet due to its complexity, many people do not understand what impact the CAP has on their daily lives. I am very much looking forward to the launch of the ‘CAP, What’s cooking?’ project, to see the faces of the young chefs and ‘foodies’ that will work side-by-side with Europe’s young farmers to explore the ’tasty’ side of agricultural policy!”.

The launch will mark the start of a new Groupe de Bruges’ project to communicate the CAP 2014-2020 to the general public. Following the Milan event, seven local events will be held in March and April 2016 on farms across the European Union. Each will host a one day programme of farm tours, cookery workshops by local chefs, CAP presentations by experts and stakeholders as well as lunch- and dinner-debates.
In parallel a CAP Cook Book, will be developed and will include brief explanations on the various topics of the Common Agricultural Policy, farm portraits and recipes from renowned, local chefs, using products from the area.
More information on the project is available at http://www.capwhatscooking.eu

event150914-agurb2015

Urbanisation is a troublesome reality. By 2050, 70% of the population will live in cities, thus increasing the pressure on food systems, with the necessity to preserve land for food production and to manage enormous food flows towards cities. Among the challenges to face, there are 3  food paradoxes :

– malnutrition,
– land grabbing
– food losses and waste.

Our commitment on these must be related to the necessity we have to adapt to on-going climate changes, to work hard on global warming mitigation and to stop wasting all non renewable ressources…

Many speakers have invited us to question the logics that have brought us to where we are and in particular the omnipotence of technology. Transition asks us to move, either at personnal and collective level, from dualism towards integration.

This concerns many issues such as urban/rural, production/consumption, global/local, food sustainability/food safety etc.

Looking at agriculture, the modernization has been mainly based on chemistry and physics with emphasis on mechanization and chemical inputs. The reflexion on agro-ecology gives many indications on the ways to revert such trend, starting to restore farmers as stewarts of life rather than users of land and resources.

It is necessary to recognize the value of small scale farming and create more equitable situation in front of intensive monocultures development. As it has been quoted during plenary sessions :

Chinese peasants feed 22% of world population with only 7% of the world arable land. Such chinese experience shows that small scale agriculture is possible.

Looking for solutions, we must keep in mind that food is not only a concern,  for it can be also a lever to reduce environmental impacts, increase resilience capacity and impulse local dynamics of social innovation.

In such an « open for change situation », civil society has a role to play as a space of innovation and  as a driver of change for transition towards sustainable food systems. New governance models are needed that take into account the aspirations of civil society and facilitate the grass roots innovations. In such context, food policy councils can be considered as one of the most proeminent and rapid innovation in the last decade.

Domaine de Villarceaux is the proud witness of centuries old episodes of French history, and not too far from them we were working diligently on the future of the most important thing in the human existence: Food, as sustenance and nourishment, with all the pleasure and pain it entails.

We started our journey seeing how water, air, fire and earth interact within the food system, and explored how the food system affects all four of them. From the world of phytoplanktons with Pierre Mollo, the threats of climate change with Lučka Bogataj, to how much energy goes into our food with Alessandro Cerutti, and soil degradation with Boris Boincean. These intense eye openers fuelled the group discussions, fostered by participation and sharing, and led eventually to thinking of the Fifth element, the ether, the human spirit, the essence of life, that happens to be the missing ingredient in all our food related arguments. As concious beings we need nourishment, that we cannot acheive by tampering with the four elements in order to produce food and bring it to our tables.

And so a declaration was signed to reflect the aspirations and hopes of 42 young people who only want the best for themselves and the world around them, encompassing not only humans, not only sentient beings, but all of existence that surrounds us. It doesn’t end there though, as we are devoting the morning of our last day together to disseminate this powerful message through all the channels that matter, and create a mechanism by which we could really remain united for food.

We share a passion and concern for our food systems, and acknowledge an urgent need for a shift in paradigm – but we are full of hope. We propose solutions using the framework of the five elements:

WATER is a common and non-renewable resource facing continuous threats. It must be protected for future generations without compromising quality.

  1. Ensure equitable access to clean water by fostering collective management and impeding speculation, financialization and commodification
  2. Conserve water use in the food system by improving efficiency of irrigation and processing
  3. Prevent water contamination by minimizing pollution from agriculture and industry
  4. Invest in innovative practices such as rain water harvesting and recycling of grey water
  5. Empower small-scale fishing communities and enhance ecologically-responsible practices in aquaculture

AIR is the circulatory system that regulates our biosphere. We are responsible for irreversible changes to our climate. We must mitigate our impacts on the air and adapt to imminent changes in order to give breath to the next generations.

  1. Promote agricultural practices that both reduce emissions and protect air quality
  2. Encourage less greenhouse gas- (GHG) intensive supply chains through tracking and taxing emissions
  3. Encourage consumers to reduce excessive meat consumption and adopt more plant-based diets

EARTH, the living organism from which we grow, is in danger due to our technocratic culture of limitless growth, negligence and apathy. When we plant poison, we harvest poison. We must integrate ourselves into the cycle of the earth and feed the soil instead of the yield.

  1. Address food security and public health in cities through promotion of urban agriculture and community-based models of distribution
  2. Strengthen urban-rural connections to facilitate market access and direct contact between producers and consumers
  3. Facilitate land reform in order to create fair land tenure systems and guarantee land access for small-scale and young farmers, as well as traditional and Indigenous communities
  4. Create policy mechanisms to protect fertile land from the encroachment of urban sprawl
  5. Improve infrastructure and change marketing and consumption practices to reduce food loss and waste across the food supply chain
  6. Adopt best management practices at the farm level to restore and protect soil fertility
  7. Foster organization and knowledge-sharing between farmers as an incentive for resilient and restorative family farming
  8. Invest responsibly in rural development and facilitate access to infrastructure, technology and education
  9. Foster seed sovereignty and protect biodiversity by valuing local plant varieties and ensuring control over reproductive resources

FIRE is an expression of energy that has spurred the development and growth of civilization. Energy is not created or destroyed, it is only transformed. Therefore, we must prioritize cleaner sources of energy, appropriately and responsibly managed, to heal our food systems.

  1. Transition to renewable and responsible energy sources along the food supply chain
  2. Manage and save energy in food production, storage, distribution and waste systems
  3. Encourage energy-efficient, local, and short supply chains and seasonal consumption habits
  4. Recognize equitable human labour as a valuable source of energy in the food system
  5. Ensure that biofuel production does not compromise food security

THE FIFTH ELEMENT unites all others and represents food as more than a fuel or the sum of its parts. It is belonging. It is appreciation. It is connection. It nourishes the human spirit and body. However, it is the missing ingredient in our current food system and integral to a new one. We must revise and uphold our values and nurture connections between ourselves and the ecosystems which support life.

  1. Eat mindfully and relish the experience of savouring taste
  2. Ensure food quality, human rights, fair working conditions, and animal and ecological welfare
  3. Respect cultural heritage, traditions and rights around land and food, and incorporate traditional and Indigenous wisdom into our food systems
  4. Foster a human ethic of respect, awareness and empathy towards land, water, air and food
  5. Build community by sharing our knowledge and experiences in the food system
  6. Acknowledge food as sacred, as a pillar of food sovereignty

We believe that we need to address the root causes of global food and agriculture crises rather than the symptoms. In the short-term, we need to reform our economic system by increasing transparency and redefining measures of success from reductionist to holistic, from quantity to quality, and from growth to stability and resilience. In the long-term, we need a systemic socio-cultural shift from an egocentric ethic of competition and commodification to an ecocentric and partnership ethic of co-operation and community. These changes should be made by fostering grassroots activities and food sovereignty; respecting and integrating cultural heritage and traditional ecological knowledge; re-framing our educational and information systems; demanding an intersectional approach to equity, incorporating gender, ethnicity, socio-economic class, age, and ability; decentralizing and redistributing power to local communities; and reforming political governance mechanisms to facilitate this change.

No one solution will be effective if implemented in isolation, they must be adopted together. As we – the youth of Eating City Summer Campus 2015 – return to our respective regions, we will be working towards these goals through our engagement in the food system. In acknowledgement of the urgency of our current state, we expect that these solutions will be implemented in policy and decision-making at multiple scales.

We call to action a change in our food system paradigm.

La Bergerie de Villarceaux, August 19, 2015

Download the signed declaration

Error: Contact form not found.

Eating City Blog FNH banniere-300-250-cagette

Such shift of Public Food Policy towards sustainable food systems is emblematic of the cultural change good public meals may induce in the population.

If the introduction of organic food often is the way to initiate a change, more generally, the modification of meal ingredients and the reduction of food wastage are two major areas of focus that drive to a deep and challenging reorganization of meal preparation, only feasible with skilled staff. Therefore training and education, to raise awareness and increase skills are a main leverage of action.

Because of the foregoing, Eating City is glad to be part of this collaborative tool kit, by sharing all suitable ressources: report best practices, videos, etc.  that can contribute, together with all other partners of this portal, to support projects owners, from farm to fork, producers, buyers, cooks, but also assocuiations and local authorities, who all have a part to play in sustainable public food services.

See more

Despite the evidence that a city eats – it eats food and in some way the land needed to produce it -, accelerating the decline of rural territories, food is not usually considered among the competences of a city. Moreover, food issues are too often diluted between different aspects related to health, nutrition, environment, production, public food services or local economy, all being treated separately in a counterproductive systematic approach. However today, more and more cities re-evaluate food projects as means to improve urban planning and management, thus opening simultaneously several avenues for reflection, research and action. In a stimulating space of innovation, they are looking at new roles for institutions in food innovation dynamics and at tailor-made interfaces of cooperation between urban centers and adjacent territories. Innovative propositions are experimented, to combine food democratic imperatives, open participatory processes and food issues institutionalization, whereas a long-awaited common metric system is still needed to assess the consequences of food systems on environmental, social, economic assets.

All these cities involved in pro-active food related urban policies are driven by extremely diverse motivations, ranging from:

  • the fragility of a food system exclusively relying on globalized commodities, subject to speculation,
  • the added value of a vivid local economy based on high quality food production,
  • an agenda 21 and a plan for the reduction of CO2 emissions,
  • the potential of healthy food access to control obesity epidemics or to educate young people to make healthier food choices,
  • etc.

The exam of successful projects shows how these pioneers have been able to detect the capacity of food-related projects to strengthen social cohesion and create a social bond, on top of many other benefits. Indeed, not only food can become a thread that connect all the main competences of the cities related to urban environment, economic development, education, solidarity, culture and leisure, health, politics and governance, but it can also give consistency to a synergic osmosis between cities and adjacent territories.

Historically, food has been a pivotal factor in the political construction of Europe, as Common Agriculture Policy has been one of the pillars of the European Union. Therefore, as food and drink industry is the largest EU manufacturing sector in terms of turnover and employment, it is not a utopia to think that sustainable food systems could become major assets of the Europe 2020 strategy of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.